it is an interesting dilemma, from my POV anyway (my country has had a stable, democratic Western government since its creation, the same people have had the same interest in creating and keeping its National Archives).
What is the fate of a nations important/permanent papers when the view and opinion of what is important to keep can change with each governmental revolution? Plus Egypt’s only been free of colonial-ish rule since the 50’s and how much did the Brits perpetuate the valuation of Egyptian antiquities over modern historical documents/records?
Maybe they (the current souls tasked with running the National Archives) should be allowed a bit of a pass? Lots of other things in the country are falling into place at this time. Of course a new collections plan will need to be written and ideas of permanent records and important national papers will need to be developed and solidified before donors should, I guess, trust the Egyptian archives.
Not that we shouldn’t be critical of a negligent institution, but let’s not paint them into a corner and give them the rep of unsafe-ignorant-origin country that can’t protect it’s own stuff before they get up off the ground.